Virginia Meiske Ardiningrum, Jefri Audi Wempi Liwoso
- Virginia Meiske Ardiningrum: LSPR Institute of Communication and Business , Indonesia
- Jefri Audi Wempi Liwoso: LSPR Institute of Communication and Business , Indonesia
Article Metrics
- Views0
- Downloads0
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
Crisis management is an important aspect in Public Relations (PR) practice, especially in the digital era when public perception can change rapidly due to the dynamics of social media. One phenomenon that often causes a reputation crisis for companies is cancel culture, a collective movement that rejects individuals or brands that are considered to be in conflict with certain social values. This phenomenon is increasingly widespread, one of which is affecting a local beauty company, Scarlett Whitening. The cancel culture movement #BoikotScarlett emerged due to a video uploaded by Scarlett Whitening's CEO on Instagram that was considered to be siding with Israel in the midst of the Israel-Palestine conflict. This sparked public criticism and calls for a boycott that spread widely on social media, thus impacting the brand's reputation and decreasing consumer interest. This study aims to analyze how Scarlett Whitening's crisis management is carried out in dealing with cancel culture, as well as the factors that encourage people's involvement in this movement. The theory used is the New Social Movement theory which explains how social groups gather and act to resolve issues that are considered important. The research method used is qualitative with a constructivism paradigm, and data collection techniques through interviews and literature studies. The results of the study show that the cancel culture #BoikotScarlett is a real example of how social media can mobilize public opinion and change a brand's image in a short time. Although Scarlett Whitening has made clarifications and crisis communication strategies, the response is considered less firm, making the boycott movement still continue. This study emphasizes that companies need to implement more effective and careful issue management strategies in their corporate communication practices to avoid the negative impacts of cancel culture and maintaining brand reputation. The results of the study show that most consumers who stopped using Scarlett products have various reasons, including perceptions of product quality that are considered mediocre and brand involvement in controversial issues that trigger dissatisfaction. Triangulation analysis shows that consumers expect rebranding and more transparency from Scarlett Whitening in dealing with circulating issues. Key recommendations for the brand include improving product quality, more effective communication strategies in dealing with crises, and more transparent policies on social issues that concern consumers. Thus, this study provides insights for companies in managing reputation and maintaining customer trust in the digital era."
Keywords
Cancel Culture ; Crisis Management ; New Social Movement
Article Metadata
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page to understand its reach and credibility.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges by sharing data, materials, or preregistered studies.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025)
-
Section: Computer & Communication Science
-
Published: %750 %e, %2025
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2025 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/jtik.v9i4.3974
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence for indexing, recommendation, and citation analysis, we enhance the visibility and impact of published research.
Virginia Meiske Ardiningrum
Communication Science Study Program, Faculty of Communication, LSPR Institute of Communication and Business, Central Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia.
-
-
Anshori, I., & Nadiyya, F. A. A. (2023). Peran ruang digital sebagai transformasi gerakan aksi sosial mahasiswa melalui platform sosial media. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v12i2.68981.
-
-
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2023). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. In Handbook of Digital Politics (pp. 287–338). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377585.00030.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pradini, R. P., & Wempi, J. A. (2019). Desain interior sebagai medium komunikasi nonverbal restoran Eat Happens dalam membentuk reputasi. PRofesi Humas Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hubungan Masyarakat, 3(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v3i2.18734.
-
-
-
Tufekci, Z. (2019). A response to Johanne Kübler’s review of Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 32(3), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-9317-2.
-
-
-
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political effects of the internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
- Authors retain full copyright of their work
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
- This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.