Analisis Pengaruh Proactive Personality dan Psychological Capital Terhadap Individual Work Performance yang Dimediasi Oleh Work Engangement Pada Industri Fast Food di Jakarta Pusat

Authors

  • Felisa Salsabila Universitas Trisakti
  • Netania Emilisa Universitas Trisakti
  • Sherly Sanchia Stacia Fam Universitas Trisakti
  • Fitriyah Ningsih Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i2.6133

Keywords:

Proactive Personality, Psychological Capital, Individual Work Performance, Work Engagement, Fast Food Employees

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Proactive Personality and Psychological Capital on Individual Work Performance with Work Engagement as a mediating variable among fast food employees in Central Jakarta, who have fast-paced work characteristics and high turnover rates, thus requiring employees to have psychological factors and proactive behaviors in order to maintain optimal performance. The research was designed using a hypothesis testing approach with a descriptive quantitative method and purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through an online questionnaire administered to 160 respondents and measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The data analysis method used descriptive statistics with SPSS, testing the influence using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS, testing the mediation of Work Engagement with the Sobel test, and evaluating the model fit theory. The results showed that Proactive Personality, Psychological Capital, and Work Engagement had a significant effect on Individual Work Performance among fast food employees in central Jakarta. Furthermore, Proactive Personality and Psychological Capital significantly influence Work Engagement, while the mediation analysis shows that Work Engagement does not significantly influence the relationship between Proactive Personality and Psychological Capital on Individual Work Performance. The implications of this study are that companies should focus on strengthening employees' personality and psychological factors and creating a work environment that supports dedication and enthusiasm to improve individual performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Felisa Salsabila, Universitas Trisakti

    Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia.

  • Netania Emilisa, Universitas Trisakti

    Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia.

  • Sherly Sanchia Stacia Fam, Universitas Trisakti

    Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia.

  • Fitriyah Ningsih, Universitas Trisakti

    Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia.

References

Abdullah, Z., & Panneerselvam, T. L. (2019). The relationships between social networking and individual job performance of law sector in Malaysia. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 12(2). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211482813.

Abidin, N. S. Z., Adam, S., Jah, N. J. A., Rahmat, N. H., Aziz, A. A., & Nadri, H. N. (2021). Investigating work engagement at the workplace. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 11(9), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.119.409.420.

Alnagbi, M. A., Aldabbas, H., Gernal, L., Elamin, A. M., & Ahmed, A. Z. E. (2025). Work engagement and individual work performance in the UAE: The mediating role of work-life balance. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1567207.

Aloulou, W. J., Almarshedi, R. F., Alharbi, S. S., & Alharbi, H. S. (2025). Fueling innovation from within: The psychological pathways to innovative work behavior in Saudi public authorities. Administrative Sciences, 15(8), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080295.

Andri, G., Rabiatul Adawiyah, W., Purnomo, R., & Candra, Y. (2021). Nurturing individual job performance through psychological capital power. BISMA (Bisnis dan Manajemen), 14(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v14n1.p27-45.

Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207.

Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471.

Biswal, K., Srivastava, K. B. L., & Alli, S. F. (2025). Psychological capital and work engagement: Moderating role of social relationships. Annals of Neurosciences, 32(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531231198964.

Callea, A., Caracuzzo, E., Costanzi, M., & Urbini, F. (2022). Promoting flow at work through proactive personality: A sequential mediation model with evidence from Italian employees. Sustainability, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052477.

Çavuş, M., & Gökçen, A. (2015). Psychological capital: Definition, components and effects. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 5(3), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjesbs/2015/12574.

Chen, W., Zhu, X., Sun, S., Liao, S., & Guo, Z. (2021). The impact of employees’ psychological capital on innovative work behavior: The chain mediating effect of knowledge donating and knowledge collecting. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761399.

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x.

Darwati Erta. (2025). KFC (FAST) kurangi 2.883 karyawan sepanjang 2024, rugi membengkak. Bisnis.com.

Deatrin, C., & Lukito, R. (2020). Determinasi kepribadian proaktif terhadap kesuksesan karir melalui leader member exchange. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 8.

Demir, S., & Avci, S. (2024). The mediator role of psychological ownership in the effect of perceived managerial support on individual work performance: A research in the health care sector. Sosyoekonomi, 32(62), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.04.07.

Dewi, Y. T., Susanti, E., & Anindita, R. (2022). The role of psychological capital, subjective well-being, and work engagement in improving the performance of manufacturing industry employees. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6808.

Drown, D. (2000). Work design characteristics as moderators of the relationship between proactive personality and engagement [Doctoral dissertation]. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1073.

Emilisa, N., Yudhaputri, E. A., & Karimah, N. W. (2021). The impact of leader’s humor styles on creativity and work engagement of call center employees in Jakarta. Jurnal of Management Info, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v8i2.2003.

Fan, J., Fan, Y., Yu, L., & Man, S. (2022). How hindrance stress, proactive personality, and the employment relationship atmosphere affect employees’ innovative behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.969013.

Farrington, S. M. (2018). Psychological well-being and perceived financial performance: An SME perspective. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(4), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i4.42.

Friskila Limbong, R., & Prameswari, Y. (2025). Individual work performance, organizational brilliance: Bagaimana kontribusi personal menciptakan keunggulan kolektif organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Zona Psikologi, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.37776/jizp.v7i3.1867.

Gallup. (2025). Global data summary—State of the Global Workplace 2025.

Gull, M., Ahmed, A., & Hassan, S. (2022). The work engagement and job characteristics: Systematic review and guidelines for future avenues. Global Social Sciences Review, 7(2), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2022(vii-ii).38.

Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.

Hariyadi, M. H. (2019). Pengaruh psychological capital terhadap work engagement pada karyawan. Cognicia, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v7i3.9200.

Harter, J. (2024, February 26). The new challenge of engaging younger workers. Gallup.

Homebase Team. (2025, October 29). Restaurant employee turnover rate: 2025 statistics, costs, and retention strategies. Homebase.

Hu, R., & Li, C. (2025). Exploring the roles of entrepreneurial education, proactive personality and creative self-efficacy in the formation of undergraduates’ new venture ideas in China. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020185.

Hu, X., Zhao, R., Gao, J., Li, J., Yan, P., Yan, X., Shao, S., Su, J., & Li, X. (2021). Relationship between proactive personality and job performance of Chinese nurses: The mediating role of competency and work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.533293.

Jamil, S., Ahmad, A., & Ghufron, J. (2023). The role of human resource management in the organization. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i12.1791.

Jia, L., & Zhang, P. (2025). The impact of psychological capital on job performance among government employees in China. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98045-5.

Joesah, N., Latumahina, J., & Armaniah, H. (2023). The influence of work flexibility and leadership on work engagement of Generation Z with job satisfaction as an intervening variable. JEcombi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.58471/jecombi.v4i02.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles